Deglutition preservation after swallowing (Swoars)-sparing IMRT in head and neck cancers: Definitive results of A multicenter prospective study of the italian association of radiotherapy and clinical oncology (Airo)

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

BackgroundTo investigate changes of objective instrumental measures and correlate with patient reported outcomes (PROs) of radiation-induced dysphagia (RID) after swallowing organs at risk (SWOARs)-sparing IMRT. MethodsPatients (pts) underwent Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES), Videofluoroscopy (VFS) and M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) questionnaire at baseline, 6 and 12 months after treatment. They were categorized in two groups: MDADI-C ≥ 80 and MDADI-C < 80. Pharyngeal residue (PR) and penetration (P) or aspiration (A) were considered as surrogate of RID. ResultsBetween 2016 and 2022 we enrolled 75 pts, 40 (53 %) MDADI-C ≥ 80 and 35 (47 %) MDADI-C < 80 at baseline.Among MDADI-C ≥ 80 the mean baseline PR score at FEES was 0,42 rising to 1,36 at 6 months (p = 0,001) and stabilizing to 1,15 at 12 months (p = 0,21); indeed, the mean baseline PR score at VFS was 0,55 rising to 1 at 6 months (p = 0,069) and slightly dropping to 0,7 at 12 months (p = 0,069). Among MDADI-C < 80 the mean baseline PR score at FEES was 0,56 rising to 1,07 at 6 months (p = 0,012) and stabilizing to 1,07 at 12 months (p = 0,99); indeed the mean baseline PR score at VFS was 0,67 rising to 1,19 at 6 months (p = 0,04) and dropping to 0,78 at 12 months (p = 0,04). No correlation was found between PROs and objective measures. ConclusionOur results show optimal acceptable deglutition preservation from major complications after SWOARs-sparing IMRT by means of low objective scores in both MDADI-C groups. Lack of correlation between PROs and objective measures suggest that referred RID is likely associated to persistence of SWOARs inflammation rather than to a real impairment of function.