Abstract

AbstractA performance‐based design procedure is proposed for seismically isolated bridges with/without supplemental energy dissipation devices. Considering multiple performance levels (PLs), the proposed method initially identifies the critical hazard level and “near‐optimal” alternatives of the isolation system. Both performance and economy are evaluated based on the inelastic response of reduced‐degree‐of‐freedom (RDOF) isolation and energy dissipation systems. Nonlinear response history analysis (NLRHA) of the multi‐degree‐of‐freedom (MDOF) system is employed in successive design steps, corresponding to different PLs, to refine the design solution through the control of a broad range of material strains and deformations. The above characteristics aim to deliver a rigorous and broadly applicable design method that reduces the high computational effort characterising complex design frameworks, while addressing identified deficiencies of alternative displacement‐based methods. The efficiency of the proposed design methodology is demonstrated by applying it to an actual bridge that was previously designed for ductile behaviour. Alternative isolation and energy dissipation schemes are investigated. Assessment of the design through NLRHA reveals in all cases enhanced seismic performance and cost reduction in the substructure design, thus rendering base‐isolation an appealing design alternative.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.