Abstract

The authors discuss the definitions of environmental monitoring (EM), biological monitoring (BM) and health surveillance (HS) as agreed upon by a CEC/NIOSH/OSHA-seminar in 1980. They emphasize the essential differences in underlying principles. They add a fourth definition of biological effect monitoring (BEM). Each method has its own assets and liabilities. Moreover, EM and BM require another decision-making process (situation-centered) then BEM and HS (client-entered) of measures to be taken. When the differences between the four approaches are not taken into account, valid preventive measures may be hampered.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.