Abstract

Background: pp65 antigenaemia and real-time PCR are two methods that are used to diagnose CMV infection in its early stages and, thereby, to facilitate initiation of pre-emptive therapy.Objectives: Firstly, to compare PCR with antigenaemia and clinical outcome in order to define a clinical threshold for starting pre-emptive therapy. Secondly, to study the impact of the transplant recipient’s serological status on the viral load and on the cut-offs.Study Design: Sixty-two patients were analysed using antigenaemia (APAAP method) and real-time PCR. ROC curves were established with antigenaemia or clinical outcome as reference. Patients were divided into primo-infection or reactivation on the basis of the serological status.Results: PCR correlated better with the clinical data (AUC closer to 1 and best sensitivity, PPV and NPV) than antigenaemia. Furthermore, the performance of qPCR was even better in the reactivation patients.Conclusions: This work suggests that transplant recipients should be divided according to their serological status. Indeed, replacing antigenaemia by real-time PCR for decisions regarding initiation of pre-emptive therapy is of particular appeal in patients with positive serology. As a result of this work, we have set our clinical threshold at 1,500 copies/ml for reactivation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.