Abstract
Social psychology covers a widely diverse area. Indeed, there is no agreement on exactly what constitutes it as a field of study. Following House's (1977) ‘three faces’ distinction—psychological social psychology, symbolic interactionism, and psychological sociology—this paper provides a critical review of the literature. In conclusion, it suggests that social psychology is not alone in the social sciences with regard to its amorphous and somewhat directionless nature.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
