Abstract
In this paper we analyse the requirements for a redefinition of knowledge that would block all the Gettier-like counterexamples raised against the traditional definition of knowledge. For this purpose we provide a classification of all the possible Gettier-like counterexamples. We claim that this classification is exhaustive because it lists all the logical representations of the Gettier-like counterexamples. This enables us to define a Gettier-like counterexample and suggests a definition of knowledge that would not allow counterexamples of such a sort. Our approach is proof-theoretical, i.e. our formal representation of a Gettier-like counterexample is proof-theoretical and, hence, our definition is in line with it.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
