Abstract
Voids presenting in impressions of five automixed addition silicone elastomers were investigated. Impressions were prepared with the putty-light body impression technique on stainless-steel cylinders with acrylic spacers. The number of voids was counted at a predetermined site on three separate days using a stereomicroscope at x7 magnification. Impression specimens of a hand-mixed addition silicone, and from hand-mixing of the automixed materials, were made for comparison. Express gave a significantly higher number of voids than other automixed materials, with President Jet having the lowest void count. Automixed materials generally produced impressions with significantly fewer voids than the hand-mixed material. Automixing was effective in reducing void defects in elastomeric impressions.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
