Abstract

This paper analyzes the most relevant spatial-temporal stochastic properties of benchmark synthetic mobility models. Each pattern suffers from various mobility flaws, as will be shown by the models’ validation. A set of metrics is used to describe mobility features, such as the speed decay problem, the density wave phenomenon, the spatial node distribution, and the average neighbor percentage. These metrics have already been validated for the random waypoint mobility model (RWPMM), but they have not yet been verified for other mobility patterns that are most frequently used. For this reason, this investigation attempts to deeply validate those metrics for other mobility models, namely the Manhattan Grid mobility, the Reference Point Group mobility, the Nomadic Community mobility, the Self-Similar Least Action Walk, and SMOOTH models. Moreover, we propose a novel mobility metric named the “node neighbors range”. The relevance of this new metric is that it proves at once the set of outcomes of previous metrics. It offers a global view of the overall range of mobile neighbors during the experimental time. The current research aims to more rigorously understand mobility features in order to conduct a precise assessment of each mobility flaw, given that this fact further impacts the performance of the whole network. These validations aim to summarize several parameters into 18,126 different scenarios with an average of 486 validated files. An exhaustive analysis with details like those found in this paper leads to a good understanding of the accurate behaviors of mobility models by displaying the ability of every pattern to deal with certain topology changes, as well as to ensure network performances. Validation results confirm the effectiveness and robustness of our novel metric.

Highlights

  • Mobility models (MMs) are aimed at describing the movement patterns of mobile users and how their mobility parameters change during the observation period

  • We have shown the first attempt to validate some mobility models in networks taking into consideration the most relevant mobility metrics, namely the speed decay problem, the density wave phenomenon, spatial node distribution, and the average neighbor percentage

  • A better performance is shown by the RPGMM and Similar Least Action Walk (SLAW), as demonstrated in the previously depicted results

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mobility models (MMs) are aimed at describing the movement patterns of mobile users (nodes) and how their mobility parameters (position, speed, and acceleration) change during the observation period. They are described by physical motion laws This category always attracts interest among the researcher community because these synthetic MMs can deploy an arbitrary number of nodes over a large simulation field in order to mimic a specific movement behavior in the presence of many network constraints. A proper mobility validation can accurately detect the causes of network deterioration without needing to implement a mobility pattern to analyze the performances of the real mobile network For these reasons, in this paper, we first validate the previously suggested mobility metrics for some popular synthetic mobility models that have not been verified until now.

Preliminaries
Validation of Mobility Models
Speed Decay Problem
Density Wave Phenomenon
Average Neighbor Percentage
Spatial Node Distribution
The Proposed Metric
Result
Mobility Metrics Global Intention
Mobility Metrics and Resources Management Overview
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call