Deep chemical structure of the southern African mantle from kimberlite megacrysts

Abstract

Research Article| June 01, 2004 Deep chemical structure of the southern African mantle from kimberlite megacrysts David R. Bell; David R. Bell Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 5251 Broad Branch Road, N.W., Washington DC 20015, U.S.A., Present address: Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry and Department of Geological Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe AZ 85287-1604, U.S.A., Department of Geological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700, South Africa e-mail: David.R.Bell@asu.edu Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Rory O. Moore Rory O. Moore Mineral Services Canada Inc., 409 Granville Street Ste 1300, Vancouver, B.C., V6C 1T2, Canada. Department of Geological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700, South Africa Email: Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar South African Journal of Geology (2004) 107 (1-2): 59–80. https://doi.org/10.2113/107.1-2.59 Article history first online: 07 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation David R. Bell, Rory O. Moore; Deep chemical structure of the southern African mantle from kimberlite megacrysts. South African Journal of Geology 2004;; 107 (1-2): 59–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.2113/107.1-2.59 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietySouth African Journal of Geology Search Advanced Search Abstract Xenoliths of the Cr-poor megacryst suite were formed by the crystallization of magmas in the deeper regions of subcontinental lithospheric mantle of southern Africa, and may be used to probe its compositional structure. Some 2300 pyrope garnet megacrysts from 61 kimberlites in southern Africa define four broad arrays on the basis of Cr2O3 – Mg# systematics, referred to as H-, M-, L-and diffuse trends. M-trend megacrysts, representing typical Cr-poor megacryst compositions, occur over much of the southwestern Kaapvaal Craton, continuing into the Proterozoic Namaqua Province to the west. In contrast, all suites examined from the Zimbabwe Craton, as well as the Premier kimberlite cluster on the Kaapvaal craton, are dominated by H-trend megacrysts. The boundary between the two domains corresponds broadly to the locus of a region of slower seismic velocity in the uppermost mantle. L-trend megacrysts with very low Cr contents and diffuse, steeply inclined trends occur around the periphery of the continent and in zones of previous tectonic activity. Variations in Cr2O3 – Mg# trends are attributed to different megacryst magma sources and variations in the chemical character and depth of lithospheric mantle into which megacryst magmas are emplaced. In addition to the classic fractional crystallization processes, partial melting and magma-wall rock interaction are recognized as potentially important influences on megacryst composition. However, uncertainties in the quantitative contributions of each process render speculative the broader-scale geodynamic interpretations of the regional distribution patterns.Megacrysts in orangeites appear to reflect an origin and evolution in depleted lithospheric mantle. High-Cr megacrysts in kimberlites of the northern cratonic areas bear the influence of lithospheric mantle and their distribution its accessibility to infiltration. Commonly coherent M-trends of the southern Kaapvaal could be interpreted to indicate that the lithosphere in this region was locally less easily infiltrated, that complete conversion of depleted lithosphere to fertile mantle resembling the megacryst magma source by high magmatic flux occurred, or that shallow emplacement of megacryst-magma source mantle into the lower regions of the lithosphere preceded megacryst emplacement, effectively shielding the magmas from overlying lithosphere. The steeply trending, diffuse patterns are thought to result from some combination of changes in phase proportions in response to shallower intrusion of megacryst magmas, mixed source regions that include involvement of low-Cr, possibly oceanic mantle, and the enhanced degree of lithospheric interaction afforded by tectonized and more fertile lithosphere of Proterozoic orogenic belts and intra-continental rifts. Present megacryst sampling in space and time allows for the lateral differences to be long-lived features of the subcontinental mantle, and permit a possible origin for megacryst magmas with OIB affinities within the continental mantle root or boundary layer. These speculations may be resolved with an increased sampling density and understanding of megacryst petrogenesis. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.