Abstract
Abstract From the middle of the twentieth century onwards, the order of the ocean has changed as remarkably as that of land. Yet, developments in the law of the sea usually receive less prominent consideration in international or global histories of this period. In this short essay, I examine firstly the ways in which literatures in history and international law engage, or not, with the ordering of the ocean during, and due to, decolonization. Secondly, I suggest that the making of the law of the sea offers rich insights into the contingencies, currents, and counter-currents of the decolonization moment. Among other things it reveals fluid political geographies, epistemic churn, and alternative models for the extraction and distribution of natural resources. The flickerings and foreclosures of the various possibilities of the decolonization moment are well worth further study, especially as unsettling our understandings of oceanic lines becomes necessary in the present times.
Highlights
The United Nations’ webpage on decolonization offers a snapshot of it by way of two maps.1 On the first map, titled ‘The World in 1945’, swathes of blue indicating sovereign territories are contrasted with splashes of orange that indicate non-sovereign ones
I suggest that the making of the law of the sea offers rich insights into the contingencies, currents, and counter-currents of the decolonization moment
The flickerings and foreclosures of the various possibilities of the decolonization moment are well worth further study, especially as unsettling our understandings of oceanic lines becomes necessary in the present times
Summary
The United Nations’ webpage on decolonization offers a snapshot of it by way of two maps.1 On the first map, titled ‘The World in 1945’, swathes of blue indicating sovereign territories are contrasted with splashes of orange that indicate non-sovereign ones.
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have