Abstract

Taking the four-level supply chain participated by two-echelon logistics service providers as the research object, this paper deeply studies the influence of different power structures on the optimal price and logistics service level decisions of the whole supply chain system. On this basis, this paper points out the optimal power structure of the whole supply chain system and then discusses the optimal cooperative decision-making mode to improve the operation efficiency of the supply chain system under optimal power structure. The results show that compared with the two power structures of manufacturer-led and logistics service integrator-led, the retailer-led structure is the optimal power structure, whether from the perspective of maximizing the total profit of the supply chain or the surplus of consumers. When the supply chain is facing consumers who are less sensitive to the retail price of products and more sensitive to the logistics service level, the advantages of retail-led decentralized supply chain are more significant. The centralized decision of product supply chain (PSC) and logistics service supply chain (LSSC) under different power structures is the dominant strategy, and the equilibrium strategy is Nash game adopted by both parties. At this time, the total profit of the supply chain system is the largest and the total social welfare is the largest, while the total profit and consumer surplus of the supply chain under LSSC-led structure are the smallest. When the supply chain is facing consumers with low sensitivity of logistics service level and product retail price, PSC and LSSC have more significant advantages in Nash game rather than Stackelberg game.

Highlights

  • Logistics is the source of the germination of supply chain ideas and the pillar of the in-depth development of supply chain practices [1]. erefore, logistics service providers play an important role in the research of supply chain management and decision-making. at is to say, in the operation management and decision-making of supply chain, the logistics service and the entities that provided logistics service are included in the supply chain to have an overall consideration in order to achieve a more realistic research conclusion

  • Most of the current academic research on supply chain decision-making and coordination lacks consideration and attention to logistics service providers. e specialized division of labor and rapid development of logistics make the application of logistics service supply chain (LSSC) emerge, which can provide integrated logistics solutions based on the complexity of product supply chain (PSC) logistics services; that is, due to the diversity and complexity of the demand for logistics services in the product supply chain, the logistics services provided by a single logistics company obviously cannot better meet customers’ needs [2]

  • As a PSC subchain, LSSC must be fully integrated into PSC, only by doing so can it better improve the logistics service level and overall competitiveness of the entire supply chain system and maximize the economic benefits of the entire supply chain system. erefore, it is necessary to take the entire supply chain system composed of PSC and LSSC as the research object, while this paper focuses on the optimal decisions of the supply chain system participated by the twoechelon logistics service providers under different power structures

Read more

Summary

Research Article

Received 3 February 2021; Revised 22 March 2021; Accepted 3 April 2021; Published 22 April 2021. Taking the four-level supply chain participated by two-echelon logistics service providers as the research object, this paper deeply studies the influence of different power structures on the optimal price and logistics service level decisions of the whole supply chain system. E centralized decision of product supply chain (PSC) and logistics service supply chain (LSSC) under different power structures is the dominant strategy, and the equilibrium strategy is Nash game adopted by both parties. At this time, the total profit of the supply chain system is the largest and the total social welfare is the largest, while the total profit and consumer surplus of the supply chain under LSSC-led structure are the smallest. When the supply chain is facing consumers with low sensitivity of logistics service level and product retail price, PSC and LSSC have more significant advantages in Nash game rather than Stackelberg game

Introduction
Product Consumer PSC
Retailer p Consumer PSC ps pi e LSSC
Optimal value e p pi d ps w
Combining the research results of comprehensive
PSC is dominant PSC is follower
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call