Abstract

This article explores several interpretive complexities associated with Article III(2)(a) of the Agreement on the Conservation of African-Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds (AEWA). Article III(2)(a) attempts to avoid incongruity between AEWA and the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS)—specifically, in relation to the Convention’s prohibition on the taking of animals from certain species. However, an apparent misalignment between this provision and other aspects of AEWA’s legal text results in various legal uncertainties regarding the grounds of exemption that AEWA parties may invoke to allow the taking of certain protected species, as well as the potential for further developing AEWA’s exemptions regime in the future. The article investigates the interplay between relevant provisions of AEWA and the CMS, makes suggestions regarding the possible interpretations of these provisions, and identifies the practical implications of these interpretations.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.