Abstract

Counter-deception in information fusion is a significant issue in belief functions, of which how to detect deceptive evidence is a critical problem. We give two definitions of deceptive evidence. Both the feature of the evidence (data) and the feature of the fusion system (combination rule) are considered, and the unsupervised case (without label information) and supervised case (with label information) are also covered. Detecting mathematical model of deceptive evidence is proposed to be solved using the mechanism of reinforcement learning. The proposed reward-shaping method is used to enhance the robustness of the detecting model. For the case without label information, the belief entropy is used to ensure the fusion result of the maintaining evidence to obtain the least uncertainty, and conflict management is utilized to check that the fusion result from each possible state is not counter-intuitive. The compared results of two special examples show the effectiveness of the first definitions of deceptive evidence and the proposed detecting model without label information. In addition, a real application in analyzing the reliability of the feature in DST-based classification is used to illustrate the effect of the second definition of deceptive evidence with label information.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.