Abstract

The high costs of using electric vehicles (EVs) is hindering wide-spread adoption of an EV-centric decarbonisation strategy for urban freight transport. Four opportunity charging (OC) strategies—during breaks and shift changes, during loading activity, during unloading activity, or while driving on highways—are evaluated towards reducing EV costs. The study investigates the effect of OC on the lifecycle costs and carbon dioxide emissions of four cases of different urban freight transport operations. Using a parametric vehicle model, the weight and battery capacity of operationally suitable fleets were calculated for ten scenarios (i.e., one diesel vehicle scenario, two EV scenarios without OC, and seven EV scenarios with four OC strategies and two charging technology types). A linearized energy consumption model sensitive to vehicle load was used to calculate the fuel and energy used by fleets for the transport operations. OC was found to significantly reduce lifecycle costs, and without any strong negative influence on carbon dioxide emissions. Other strong influences on lifecycle costs are the use of inductive technology, extension of service lifetime, and reduction of battery price. Other strong influences on carbon dioxide emissions are the use of inductive technology and the emissions factors of electricity production.

Highlights

  • International commitments to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions—the most common and pervasive greenhouse gas—has fuelled efforts to decarbonize the freight transport sector

  • While some governments have succeeded in incentivizing battery electric vehicles (BEVs) adoption through subsidies for purchases, fiscal measures on fuel, sponsoring BEV trials, and penalizing conventional vehicles [12,13,14], these measures mainly affect the economic calculation for vehicle choice

  • Case A (Figure 3a) has a distribution centre in the east and various cross-docking locations scattered around the rest of the island

Read more

Summary

Introduction

International commitments to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions—the most common and pervasive greenhouse gas—has fuelled efforts to decarbonize the freight transport sector. While some governments have succeeded in incentivizing BEV adoption through subsidies for purchases, fiscal measures on fuel, sponsoring BEV trials, and penalizing conventional vehicles [12,13,14], these measures mainly affect the economic calculation for vehicle choice. They do not affect its operational capabilities. Coping with operational limitations is left to the logistics companies to manage They have devised a range of strategies to compensate for the shortcomings of BEVs, as shall be explained

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call