Abstract

Abstract. This research activity aimed at reducing risk to infrastructure, such as a proposed pipeline route roughly parallel to the Yukon Alaska Highway Corridor (YAHC), by filling geoscience knowledge gaps in geohazards. Hence, the Geological Survey of Canada compiled an inventory of landslides including debris flow deposits, which were subsequently used to validate two different debris flow susceptibility models. A qualitative heuristic debris flow susceptibility model was produced for the northern region of the YAHC, from Kluane Lake to the Alaska border, by integrating data layers with assigned weights and class ratings. These were slope angle, slope aspect, surficial geology, plan curvature, and proximity to drainage system. Validation of the model was carried out by calculating a success rate curve which revealed a good correlation with the susceptibility model and the debris flow deposit inventory compiled from air photos, high-resolution satellite imagery, and field verification. In addition, the quantitative Flow-R method was tested in order to define the potential source and debris flow susceptibility for the southern region of Kluane Lake, an area where documented debris flow events have blocked the highway in the past (e.g. 1988). Trial and error calculations were required for this method because there was not detailed information on the debris flows for the YAHC to allow us to define threshold values for some parameters when calculating source areas, spreading, and runout distance. Nevertheless, correlation with known documented events helped define these parameters and produce a map that captures most of the known events and displays debris flow susceptibility in other, usually smaller, steep channels that had not been previously documented.

Highlights

  • Debris flow modelling has been carried out by several researchers – e.g. Costa (1984), Hungr et al (1984), Berti and Simoni (2007), Beguería et al (2009), Hussin et al (2012), and Fischer et al (2012), among many others

  • The debris flow susceptibility map created using the propagation of source areas represents the present-day conditions

  • The mapped debris flow deposits were used to evaluate the susceptibility map these deposits likely have been accumulating since deglaciation (Koch et al, 2014) spreading into large fans

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Debris flow modelling has been carried out by several researchers – e.g. Costa (1984), Hungr et al (1984), Berti and Simoni (2007), Beguería et al (2009), Hussin et al (2012), and Fischer et al (2012), among many others. Portions of the proposed pipeline route intersect critical geological regions and areas prone to geological hazards, such as landslides including debris flows, earthquakes due to active faults, subsidence from thermo-karstic erosion, and permafrost degradation. One of the roles of the Geological Survey of Canada (GSC), as part of Natural Resources Canada, is to reduce risk of geohazards to critical linear infrastructure, such as a proposed pipeline project by providing baseline geoscience information to decision makers. As a first step in assessing the types of geohazards, the GSC in collaboration with the Yukon Geological Survey (Huscroft et al, 2004), compiled an inventory of geological hazards, landslides (Blais-Stevens et al, 2010a). Several landslide types were observed including debris flows, debris slides, rockfalls, rock slides, active layer detachment slides, retrogressive thaw slumps, among others (Blais-Stevens et al, 2011). Once the baseline landslide information was compiled, the step was to provide an overview of the landslide distribution and landslide “hot spots” by plotting distribution maps and producing regional qualitative landslide

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call