Abstract
This paper explores the “religion of law” and the “religion in law” through analysis of judgements in the case of Dianne Pretty's challenge of the law against assisted suicide on human rights grounds. It is argued that the core articles of the religion of law, close attention to text and construction of consistency, are used to affirm the Judeo-Christian values of suffering and the sanctity of life. The affirmation of the religion in law occurs in the name of the law; however, traces of religious origin are clear in the use of the phrase “sanctity of life” as well as in the way the court legally blesses Dianne Pretty's suffering. Because of the law's monopoly on death and violence, Pretty is condemned to live, her own desires sacrificed in the interests of society. The religion in law is retrievable through application of the core values of the religion of law. Close attention to the language of the judgments uncovers an absence of legal justice (i.e. consistency) as well as a breach of the terms of the Human Rights Act in terms of respect for religion. The religion in law is imposed on Dianne Pretty such that her religious freedom, guaranteed by legislation, is curtailed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.