Abstract
The long-term hydrothermal scheduling (LTHS) problem seeks to obtain an operational policy that optimizes water resource management. The most employed strategy to obtain such a policy is stochastic dual dynamic programming (SDDP). The primary source of uncertainty in predominant hydropower systems is the reservoirs inflow, usually a linear time series model (TSM) based on the order-p periodic autoregressive [PAR(p)] model. Although the linear PAR(p) can represent the seasonality and autocorrelation of the inflow datasets, negative inflows may appear during SDDP iterations, leading to water balance infeasibilities in the LTHS problem. Different from other works, the focus of this paper is not avoiding negative inflows but instead dealing with the negative values that cause infeasibilities. Hence, three strategies are discussed: (i) inclusion of a slack variable penalized in the objective function, (ii) negative inflow truncation to zero, and (iii) optimal inflow truncation, among which the latter is a novel approach. The strategies are compared individually and combined. Methodological conditions and evidence of the algorithm convergence are presented. Out-of-sample simulations show that the choice of negative inflow strategy significantly impacts the performance of the resultant operational policy. The combination of strategy (i) and (iii) reduces the expected operation cost by 15%.
Highlights
Given its stochasticity and large scale, it is difficult to find a consistent operational policy for power systems with a predominance of hydroelectric resources
This study has presented a comparison between strategies to deal with negative inflows in the long-term hydrothermal scheduling (LTHS) problem
It was discussed how negative inflows occur in the problem, which may arise from the time series model (TSM) model or negative values presented in the historical observations
Summary
Given its stochasticity and large scale, it is difficult to find a consistent operational policy for power systems with a predominance of hydroelectric resources. The policy is usually obtained in a few steps, wherein the first one consists of solving the long-term hydrothermal scheduling (LTHS) problem. The LTHS focuses on obtaining an optimal policy that minimizes the operational cost over a pluriannual planning horizon, considering constraints related to the operating characteristics of the system and power plants. In such a long horizon, the primary source of uncertainty is associated with the inflows of hydroelectric plants, which are modeled in the LTHS problem by a multistage scenario tree. Building piecewise linear approximations of the cost-to-go functions using the trial points (backward pass). Likewise, [3,4] present tutorials regarding the application of SDDP to solve the LTHS problem
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.