Abstract

Marine protected areas (MPAs) can protect shark populations from targeted fisheries, but resident shark populations may remain exposed to stressors like capture as bycatch and environmental change. Populations of young sharks that rely on shallow coastal habitats, e.g. as nursery areas, may be at risk of experiencing these stressors. The purpose of this study was to characterize various components of the physiological stress response of neonatal reef sharks following exposure to an exhaustive challenge under relevant environmental conditions. To accomplish this, we monitored markers of the secondary stress response and measured oxygen uptake rates ( ) to compare to laboratory-derived baseline values in neonatal blacktip reef (Carcharhinus melanopterus) and sicklefin lemon sharks (Negaprion acutidens). Measurements occurred over three hours following exposure to an exhaustive challenge (gill-net capture with air exposure). Blood lactate concentrations and pH deviated from baseline values at the 3-h sample, indicating that both species were still stressed 3 h after capture. Evidence of a temperature effect on physiological status of either species was equivocal over 28-31°C. However, aspects of the physiological response were species-specific; N. acutidens exhibited a larger difference in blood pH relative to baseline values than C. melanopterus, possibly owing to higher minimum . Neither species experienced immediate mortality during the exhaustive challenge; although, single instances of delayed mortality were documented for each species. Energetic costs and recovery times could be extrapolated for C. melanopterus via respirometry; sharks were estimated to expend 9.9 kJ kg-1 (15% of energy expended on daily swimming) for a single challenge and could require 8.4 h to recover. These data suggest that neonatal C. melanopterus and N. acutidens are resilient to brief gill-net capture durations, but this was under a narrow temperature range. Defining species' vulnerability to stressors is important for understanding the efficacy of shark conservation tools, including MPAs.

Highlights

  • Marine protected areas (MPA), including shark sanctuaries, can be important conservation tools for protecting threatened shark populations

  • Blood glucose concentrations at three hours were higher than baseline values (Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD), t = 4.387, P < 0.001) and values for immediately-sampled sharks (Tukey’s HSD, t = 4.062, P = 0.002) (Fig. 1a)

  • Blood pH was uniformly reduced across all treatments relative to baseline values (Tukey’s HSD, P < 0.001) (Fig. 1c)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Marine protected areas (MPA), including shark sanctuaries, can be important conservation tools for protecting threatened shark populations. Incidental capture, or bycatch, affects shark populations through fishing-induced mortality and negative sub-lethal outcomes (Skomal and Mandelman, 2012; Wilson et al, 2014; Ellis et al, 2017). Climate change is resulting in ocean warming and acidification and can affect shark populations through local extirpation as conditions become too extreme in addition to negative sub-lethal outcomes (Rosa et al, 2017; Payne et al, 2018). Protected shark populations may be inherently at risk of experiencing negative outcomes associated with these stressors because virtually all shark sanctuaries are in the tropics. Developing an understanding of shark populations’ resilience to stressors that they are still expected to face within MPAs can provide valuable information for improving the efficacy of these conservation tools (Chin et al, 2010; Illing and Rummer, 2017)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call