Abstract
Based on results with a new method, Foucambert (2008) argued that syntactic processing can occur as far as 27 characters to the right of the fixation point. In this reply, we demonstrate that the method used by Foucambert was not appropriate. In addition, Foucambert's results did not support his conclusion. We replicate Foucambert's study while monitoring eye movements. Results revealed that subjects’ eye movements were biased to the right of the fixation point. In addition, subjects were unable to engage in syntactic processing of words far in periphery. Taken together, results fit well with current models of eye movements and of the missing-letter effect.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
