Abstract
Fanzines focusing on one particular literary author appear to have a contradictory nature: though both editors and contributors often present themselves as fans and engage in fan behavior, they express a distinct unease at being seen as ‘fans’. This article analyses this contradiction by considering three Dutch literary magazines (from the 1990s to the present): Ronflonflon, dedicated to Wim T. Schippers, Hermans-magazine, focusing on W.F. Hermans, and Buchmania Magazine, devoted to Boudewijn Buch. We argue that these magazines facilitate a cultural economy that combines popular practices with the conventions of institutionally sanctioned forms of high culture. First, the magazines’ similarities to popular fanzines are revealed by focusing on four characteristics: amateurism, audience/reader participation, genre and media diversity, and tactics of appropriation. Secondly, the article draws attention to multiple strategies of distinction that editors and contributors employ to negotiate the tensions between popular practices and official literary culture.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.