DDPG Agent to Swing Up and Balance Cart- Pole System

Abstract

Reinforcement learning is a mathematical framework for agents to interact intelligently with their environment. Unlike supervised learning, where a system learns with the help of labeled data, reinforcement learning agents learn how to act by trial and error only receiving a reward signal from their environments. A field where reinforcement learning has been prominently successful is robotics [3]. However, real-world control problems are also particularly challenging because of the noise and high- dimensionality of input data (e.g., visual input). In recent years, in the field of supervised learning, deep neural networks have been successfully used to extract meaning from this kind of data. Building on these advances, deep reinforcement learning was used to solve complex problems like Atari games and Go. Mnih et al. [1] built a system with fixed hyper parameters able to learn to play 49 different Atari games only from raw pixel inputs. However, in order to apply the same methods to real-world control problems, deep reinforcement learning has to be able to deal with continuous action spaces. Discretizing continuous action spaces would scale poorly, since the number of discrete actions grows exponentially with the dimensionality of the action. Furthermore, having a parametrized policy can be advantageous because it can generalize in the action space. Therefore with this thesis we study state-of-the-art deep reinforcement learning algorithm, Deep Deterministic Policy Gradients. We provide a theoretical comparison to other popular methods, an evaluation of its performance, identify its limitations and investigate future directions of research. The remainder of the thesis is organized as follows. We start by introducing the field of interest, machine learning, focusing our attention of deep learning and reinforcement learning. We continue by describing in details the two main algorithms, core of this study, namely Deep Q-Network (DQN) and Deep Deterministic Policy Gradients (DDPG). We then provide implementatory details of DDPG and our test environment, followed by a description of benchmark test cases. Finally, we discuss the results of our evaluation, identifying limitations of the current approach and proposing future avenues of research.