Abstract
Richard Dawkins's portrayal of science in The God Delusion serves protective ends comparable to those often attributed to apologetics. Dawkins construes science as an indefeasible explanatory framework with unlimited scope, both insulating it from the possibility of disconfirmation and expanding its boundaries far beyond common notions of “science.” In this manner, Dawkins's formulation of science mirrors the rhetorical strategies of the theist in John Wisdom's garden parable, as interpreted by Anthony Flew. In both cases, rhetorical strategies are invoked to protect certain forms of discourse. Given these conditions, science and religion remain forever trapped in Wisdom's garden.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
