Abstract
在对程序进行并行化时,为了保证结果的正确性,并行编译器只能采取一种保守的策略,也就是,如果它不能确定两段代码在并行执行时是否会发生冲突,它就不允许这两段代码并行执行.虽然这种做法保证了正确性,但同时也限制了对并行性的开发.在这种背景下,许多推测多线程方法被提了出来,这些方法通过允许可能冲突的代码段并行执行来把握更多的并行机会,同时,通过从冲突中恢复来保证结果的正确性.然而,传统推测多线程方法所使用的“沿控制流将串行程序划分为多个线程”的做法并不适合不同数据结构上的操作在控制流中相互交错的情况,因为如果沿控制流将程序线性地划分为多个线程,则同一个数据结构上的操作将被分到不同的线程中,从而非常容易发生冲突.为了有效地对这些程序进行并行化,提出了一种基于数据结构的线程划分方法与执行模型.在这种方法中,程序中的对象被划分成多个组,同一组中对象上的操作被分派到同一个线程中去执行,从而降低了在同一个数据结构上发生冲突的可能性.;While parallelizing a program, to ensure the correctness of the result, a parallel compiler can only adopt a conservative pol icy that if it cannot accurately determine whether two pieces of code wi ll conflict while being executed in parallel, it does not permit them to be executed in parallel. Although this approach can ensure correctness, it also limits the amount of parallelism that can be exploited. A number of speculative multithreading (SpMT) approaches gained wide popularity because they can get more parallelism by allowing two pieces of potentially conflicting code to execute in parallel while ensuring the correctness of the results by recovering from conflicts. However, the dividing-along-the-control-flow-path method employed by the traditional SpMT approach is unsuitable for a number of programs in which operations on different data structures are interleaved in the control flow path. If the program is linearly divided into threads along the control flow path, the operations on the same data structure will be divided among the different threads that are doomed to be prone to conflict when being executed concurrently. To effectively parallelize these programs, this paper proposes a data structure centric approach, in which the objects of a program are organized into different groups and the operations on the objects wit hin the same group are dispatched to the same thread for execution, thereby reducing the likelihood of conflict on the same data structure.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.