Abstract

National and regional yield forecasts can provide important insights into agribusiness beyond the farm gate. The incorporation of dynamical climate models into these forecasting systems strengthen their predictive performance in many cases but may contribute inherent biases to the final yield estimates. Downscaling the native climate model output so that is suitable for crop simulation modelling can also present challenges in representing realistic conditions for plant growth from a climate model. This study evaluated the performance of an operational national wheat yield forecast system for the Australian wheatbelt using climatology and seasonal climate model-based input data, and introduces an alternative approach using a data fusion method. The crop forecasting system uses the APSIM wheat model to estimate water-limited potential yield. The climatology-based forecast tended to over predict national yield (high yield bias; 1.5 to 7% across forecast months), while the model-based method (using ACCESS-S1 dynamical model) tended to under predict yield (low yield bias; -5.9 to -0.5% across forecast months) and had a lower spread than climatology (10 to 50% lower across forecast months). The model-based forecast had skill in terms of accuracy and reliability during the second half of the season. The newly developed data fusion method used a weighting method calibrated for separate forecast locations (stations) to remove bias in the mean forecast yield and reduce ensemble spread. This resulted in improvements in the Australia-wide yield forecasts across all forecast start dates. This study provides a demonstration of how a data-driven approach can be applied to a crop forecast to improve accuracy and resolution of crop yield forecasts without the need for more computationally intensive downscaling approaches.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call