Abstract

<div>Abstract<p><b>Purpose:</b> Improved understanding of the molecular basis underlying oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) aggressive growth has significant clinical implications. Herein, cross-species genomic comparison of carcinogen-induced murine and human OSCCs with indolent or metastatic growth yielded results with surprising translational relevance.</p><p><b>Experimental Design:</b> Murine OSCC cell lines were subjected to next-generation sequencing (NGS) to define their mutational landscape, to define novel candidate cancer genes, and to assess for parallels with known drivers in human OSCC. Expression arrays identified a mouse metastasis signature, and we assessed its representation in four independent human datasets comprising 324 patients using weighted voting and gene set enrichment analysis. Kaplan–Meier analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to stratify outcomes. A quantitative real-time PCR assay based on the mouse signature coupled to a machine-learning algorithm was developed and used to stratify an independent set of 31 patients with respect to metastatic lymphadenopathy.</p><p><b>Results:</b> NGS revealed conservation of human driver pathway mutations in mouse OSCC, including in <i>Trp53</i>, mitogen-activated protein kinase, phosphoinositide 3-kinase, NOTCH, JAK/STAT, and <i>Fat1-4</i>. Moreover, comparative analysis between The Cancer Genome Atlas and mouse samples defined <i>AKAP9</i>, <i>MED12L</i>, and <i>MYH6</i> as novel putative cancer genes. Expression analysis identified a transcriptional signature predicting aggressiveness and clinical outcomes, which were validated in four independent human OSCC datasets. Finally, we harnessed the translational potential of this signature by creating a clinically feasible assay that stratified patients with OSCC with a 93.5% accuracy.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> These data demonstrate surprising cross-species genomic conservation that has translational relevance for human oral squamous cell cancer. <i>Clin Cancer Res; 20(11); 2873–84. ©2014 AACR</i>.</p></div>

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call