Data-driven reliability framework for qualitative damage states of reinforced concrete beams under blast loading

Abstract

The incessant demand for protective infrastructure research has been motivated by recent accidental and intentional explosion events. This has led to a significant increase in blast design approaches and modern methods of structural analysis. When considering the analysis and response of blast-loaded members, like the identification of crack patterns and failure modes (CP & FM) of reinforced concrete (RC) beams, the current literature heavily depends on complex numerical modeling. Recently, the adoption of machine learning (ML) modeling to readily predict damage state labels of blast-loaded RC beams has emerged as a competitor to numerical methods. In either modeling method, outputs of damage states are often oversimplified as deterministic labels without elaborating on the possibility of alternative damage state. To extend on the practical usage of deterministic modeling, the present study introduces a probabilistic framework which integrates ML models towards ascertaining the probability of different CP & FM classes via the Monte Carlo simulation. The framework accounts for the uncertainties of different beam and blast parameters and incorporates four damage states of flexural cracking, bending failure, flexural-shear cracking, and crushing failure. The developed framework was evaluated against forty-two blast-loaded RC beams available from several previous experimental studies and exhibited excellent predictive performance while providing significant insight to the occurrence of all four damage states. In addition, extensive Blast Reliability Curves (BRC) were developed for eighteen RC beam cases over a wide range of blast intensities and the effects of beam and blast parameters on qualitative damage states were evaluated. The most notable observation was that the sensitivity of both concrete and steel strengths on damage state probabilities increased with reinforcement ratio. The BRCs depicted an elaborate transition of damage states with varying blast magnitudes. Also, the limitations, sources of error, and further improvements associated with the proposed methodology were clearly defined. Overall, the resulting probabilistic structural blast analysis introduced by the proposed framework serves as an intricate approach to providing greater comprehension to the CP & FM response of RC beams under blast loading which aims to promote confidence in decision making within protective design processes.