Abstract

We compared predators' damage with shell size in live individuals and empty shells (n=5066) of the snail Neritina virginea in the Mameyes River (Puerto Rico, Greater Antilles). According to the literature and direct observations, damages on empty shells were attributed to predation by aquatic birds (e.g. Gallinula chloropus) and decapods (e.g. Macrobrachium spp.), while damages on live individuals were due to rasping by co-specifics and erosion. Predation by decapods and birds, as estimated by the proportion of empty shells, was low (2 and 0.36%, respectively). Shell size was significantly different between types of predators (range: decapods: 3.5-15.0mm, birds: 8.1-19.4mm). By comparing sizes of the empty shells and the live individuals, we concluded that decapods specialize on large groups of small migratory juveniles, while birds specialize on the largest resident individuals. Worn shells were highly frequent in both empty shells and live individuals, and sizes did not differ between samples. A comparison by slow-flow and fast-flow habitats showed that predators do not discriminate shell sizes between environments. However, the frequency of damage by birds and decapods was greater under slow-flow conditions. Despite of the little contribution of predation to the population dynamics in this species, predation might be an important driver of size-dependent behavioral responses such as upstream migration and microhabitat selection.

Highlights

  • damages on empty shells were attributed to predation by aquatic birds

  • while damages on live individuals were due to rasping by co-specifics and erosion

  • Shell size was significantly different between types of predators

Read more

Summary

MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS

Especie estudiada: El gasterópodo Neritina virginea (L.) se encuentra desde la Península de la Florida y las islas Bahamas hasta el norte de Brazil, y desde el Golfo de México y América Central hasta las Antillas (Blanco 2005). Para establecer la distribución de tallas de los individuos que exhibían comportamiento migratorio, éstos se colectaron al azar dentro de grupos migratorios que cubrían áreas de hasta 21m2 sobre el lecho del río o que formaban hileras de hasta varios metros durante siete fechas diferentes entre agosto de 2000 y junio de 2001 (Blanco & Scatena 2005). Finalmente, las conchas depredadas por aves fueron significativamente más grandes que las depredadas por decápodos, y correspondieron al 60% superior (>8mm) de la distribución de tallas de los individuos de toda la población establecida (ámbito: 2.121.4mm). El cauce secundario presentó una mayor proporción tanto de conchas depredadas por aves como por decápodos, pero la diferencia fue mayor en las primeras.

DPD R
Findings
Agonostomus monticola
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call