Abstract
IntroductionMR-guided adapted radiotherapy (MRgART) using a high field MR-linac has recently become available. We report the estimated delivered fractional dose of the first five prostate cancer patients treated at our centre using MRgART and compare this to C-Arm linac daily Image Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT). MethodsPatients were treated using adapted treatment plans shaped to their daily anatomy. The treatments were recalculated on an MR image acquired immediately prior to treatment delivery in order to estimate the delivered fractional dose. C-arm linac non-adapted VMAT treatment plans were recalculated on the same MR images to estimate the fractional dose that would have been delivered using conventional radiotherapy techniques using a daily IGRT protocol. Results95% and 93% of mandatory target coverage objectives and organ at risk dose constraints were achieved by MRgART and C-arm linac delivered dose estimates, respectively. Both delivery techniques were estimated to have achieved 98% of mandatory Organ At Risk (OAR) dose constraints whereas for the target clinical goals, 86% and 80% were achieved by MRgART and C-arm linac delivered dose estimates. ConclusionsProstate MRgART can be delivered using the a high field MR-linac. Radiotherapy performed on a C-arm linac offers a good solution for prostate cancer patients who present with favourable anatomy at the time of reference imaging and demonstrate stable anatomy throughout the course of their treatment. For patients with critical OARs abutting target volumes on their reference image we have demonstrated the potential for a target dose coverage improvement for MRgART compared to C-arm linac treatment.
Highlights
Magnetic Resonance (MR)-guided adapted radiotherapy (MRgART) using a high field MR-linac has recently become available
Tissue contrast [4,5], when compared to Computed Tomography (CT) and Cone Beam CT (CBCT), available with the MRL should enable improved pre-treatment image verification whilst the unit facilitates MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART) by allowing treatment plans to be designed on the MR image acquired prior to treatment accounting for the current anatomy
By estimating delivered fractional doses of MRgART plans we have demonstrated feasibility of prostate treatment on the MRL and, similar to results presented for low-field MRgART [16], the high-field MR guided adapted technique offers a target coverage advantage over a C-arm linac for patients who present with unfavourable anatomy at the time of reference imaging and/or demonstrate significant inter-fraction anatomical variation
Summary
MR-guided adapted radiotherapy (MRgART) using a high field MR-linac has recently become available. We report the estimated delivered fractional dose of the first five prostate cancer patients treated at our centre using MRgART and compare this to C-Arm linac daily Image Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT). C-arm linac non-adapted VMAT treatment plans were recalculated on the same MR images to estimate the fractional dose that would have been delivered using conventional radiotherapy techniques using a daily IGRT protocol. For patients with critical OARs abutting target volumes on their reference image we have demonstrated the potential for a target dose coverage improvement for MRgART compared to C-arm linac treatment. Tissue contrast [4,5], when compared to Computed Tomography (CT) and Cone Beam CT (CBCT), available with the MRL should enable improved pre-treatment image verification whilst the unit facilitates MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART) by allowing treatment plans to be designed on the MR image acquired prior to treatment accounting for the current anatomy.
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have