Abstract
Promoting a dialogue between art, law, sports and war, this paper sheds light to the growing relevance of the Swiss concept of public order in private international law with regard to transnational private regimes, bringing the examples of private international law of sports and the self-regulatory scheme of international security companies. Starting with literature review and the discussion of normative documents such as FIFA Regulations, ICoCA Articles of Association and Swiss law, this paper, under inductive method, intends to identify if the purportedly transnational content of private regimes needs to observe any public order. The subject is relevant due to the multiplication of transnational private regimes, such as ICANN for the Internet and “lex mercatoria” for commercial transactions; moreover, the paper aims at identifying possible contradictions in the idea that such orders are autonomous, making an analogy with the Dadaist artistic movement. This contribution, finally, points out that in the two studied examples, there is a clear overvaluation of Swiss law in spite of imperative foreign norms and suggests that such conclusion might be extended to other types of private ordering.
Highlights
Por mais que os regimes privados transnacionais sejam capazes de condicionar, com base em valores próprios, a atuação dos agentes e a tomada de decisões nos organismos a eles vinculados, a sanção que advém da ordem pública só faz sentido, quando a norma transnacional deixa de “pairar” acima dos Estados e “pousa” no território de um deles, pedindo permissão, para ali produzir efeitos
Business organizations have set up rules and regulatory regimes in numerous industries, ranging from the Society for Worldwide Interstate Financial Telecommunications (SWIFT) system for letters of credit, to Fair Labor Association standards for sports apparel production
In national law, such private bodies are typically treated as clubs rather than administrators, unless they exercise public power by explicit delegation
Summary
Embora seja um conceito eminentemente nacional, a ordem pública de direito internacional privado só é abordada, quando se possui uma situação fática plurilocalizada, isto é, que reclama a atenção de mais outras palavras, não houve abdicação a direito laboral (indisponível), mas apenas aplicação de multa rescisória, constante de cláusula prevista no contrato, o que autorizou a utilização da arbitragem. Por mais que os regimes privados transnacionais sejam capazes de condicionar, com base em valores próprios, a atuação dos agentes e a tomada de decisões nos organismos a eles vinculados, a sanção que advém da ordem pública só faz sentido, quando a norma transnacional deixa de “pairar” acima dos Estados e “pousa” no território de um deles, pedindo permissão, para ali produzir efeitos. Business organizations have set up rules and regulatory regimes in numerous industries, ranging from the Society for Worldwide Interstate Financial Telecommunications (SWIFT) system for letters of credit, to Fair Labor Association standards for sports apparel production In national law, such private bodies are typically treated as clubs rather than administrators, unless they exercise public power by explicit delegation. Os exemplos mais avançados dessas experiências serão abordados nos dois tópicos seguintes
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
