Abstract
In the frrst half of the 20th century, an instigating confluence seems to happen between the scientific findings and the field of the so-called human sciences. We say conjluence because we understand that the emergence of a new conception of subject leads to changes in the classic science's conceptions. At the same time, the possibility of questioning science's assertiveness and objectivity allowed the emergence of a new concept of subject. Upon establishing such correlations, we believe that we are able to demonstrate the radicalism of the Freudian thought, which, when articulating the unconscious concept, brings to the human science' s scenery the possibility of thinking - as it happened in the exact sciences - the incompleteness and unpredictability, the uncertainty and chaos; likewise, only an ever lacking subject could sustain such breach in the field of scientific investigation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
