Abstract

PURPOSE: Children with Robin sequence (RS) have wide U-shaped cleft palates. Following primary palatoplasty, RS patients have high rates of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI), often requiring speech-correcting surgery. This study compares VPI rates between palatoplasty techniques among the RS population. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with isolated RS without concomitant syndromes from 1997-2022 was completed. Clinical and operative data were collected. Surgical techniques were performed by multiple senior surgeons and were categorized as Furlow double-opposing Z-plasty or straight-line palatoplasty. The primary outcome is surgical VPI rates. RESULTS: Upon review, 91 patients were identified to have isolated RS, of which 79 had a concomitant cleft palate. Overall surgical VPI rate was 11.4%. Follow-up time was 6.3±4.8 years (Furlow) and 4.2±4.0 years (straight-line; p=0.0593). Excluding patients with less than two years of follow-up, 35.7% (15/42) of Furlow patients had clinically diagnosed VPI compared to 11.8% (2/17) of the straight-line cohort (p=0.066). No patients in the straight-line cohort required speech-correcting surgery. The Furlow cohort had higher surgical VPI rates (21.4% vs. 0.0%; p=0.038) compared to straight-line. Upon Kaplan-Meier analysis, the 5-year surgical VPI rate was 11.6% and 0.0% for the Furlow and straight-line cohorts, respectively (p= 0.066). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest the Furlow technique resulted in higher surgical VPI rates than straight-line repair among our RS patients. Though the Furlow technique offers palatal lengthening, this technique may compromise velum function in this wide cleft RS population.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.