Abstract

Experiments were performed to explore differences between cultured primary and metastatic melanoma cell lines in their muscarinic acetylcholine receptor-mediated intracellular Ca signalization. The expression of type 1 and type 3 muscarinic receptors was detected and compared at the protein level using both immunocytochemistry and semiquantitative western blotting. The functionality of muscarinic receptors was tested by applying carbamylcholine (CCh; 1 mmol/l) and by recording the associated increases in cytoplasmic Ca using Ca imaging with the application of the Ca indicator dye, fluo-4. These data indicate that the expression levels of the receptor proteins were not significantly different in the metastatic (HT199, HT168-M1) and the primary (WM35) cell lines. Although Ca transients were evoked in all the three cell lines by CCh, the proportion of the CCh-positive cells was smaller amongst the WM35 cells. The Ca transients could be effectively blocked by atropine (0.1 mmol/l). The time courses of the Ca transients were highly variable, and in some instances they showed a late (plateau-like) component whose presence crucially depended on the influx of extracellular Ca. When the extracellular Ca concentration was reduced, the duration of the CCh-evoked transients was considerably decreased; a phenomenon that was more pronounced in the metastatic cell lines. Although there are no fundamental differences in the muscarinic receptor-mediated Ca signalization of the primary and metastatic cell lines, the quantitative differences showed in this study may partially explain the increased malignancy and migratory potential of the metastatic cells.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.