Abstract

The cyclic behavior of a deficient reinforced concrete bridge bent retrofitted using buckling restrained braces (BRBs) was experimentally evaluated using large scale experiments and quasi-static cyclic loading that reflected subduction zone earthquake demands. The retrofitted reinforced concrete bent specimen consisted of two circular cross section columns, a rectangular cap beam and a buckling restrained brace in a diagonal configuration. The brace was secured to the bent using steel gusset plates and post-installed adhesive anchors. The retrofitted bent was designed to perform elastically or with minor damage under different seismic hazards design levels. Two BRB designs were considered in an effort to assess the influence of the BRB design on the overall bent performance. The data from these large-scale experiments were analyzed considering bent hysteretic response, observed damage, component curvatures, internal member loads, as well as the overall stiffness and energy dissipation characteristics. The results successfully demonstrated the effectiveness of utilizing buckling restrained braces for achieving high displacement ductility of the retrofitted structure, while also controlling the damage of the existing vulnerable reinforced concrete bent. No damage was observed in the connection regions of the brace throughout the loading history, leaving the potential for rapid replaceability of the sacrificial BRB element.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.