Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate cuspal deflection caused by material shrinkage and temperature rise occurring in the pulp chamber during photopolymerization. The aim of this study was also to investigate the effect of flowable and packable bulk-fill composites on cuspal deflection occurring in mesio-occlusal–distal (MOD) cavities restored through the bulk-fill or through the incremental layering technique. Additionally, mechanical and thermal properties of bulk-fill composites were considered. Methods: Two bulk-fill composites (high-viscosity and low-viscosity), largely differing in material composition, were used. These composites were characterized through linear shrinkage and compressive test. Cuspal deformation during restoration of mesio-occlusal–distal cavities of human premolars was evaluated using both the bulk-fill and the incremental layering techniques. Temperature rise was measured through thermocouples placed 1 mm below the cavity floor. Results: Shrinkage of the flowable composite was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of packable composite, while mechanical properties were significantly lower (p < 0.05). For cusp distance variation, no significant difference was observed in cavities restored through both restorative techniques, while temperature rise values spanned from 8.2 °C to 11.9 °C. Conclusions: No significant difference in cusp deflection between the two composites was observed according to both the restorative techniques. This result can be ascribed to the Young’s modulus suggesting that the packable composite is stiffer, while the flowable composite is more compliant, thus balancing the cusp distance variation. The light curing modality of 1000 mW/cm2 for 20 s can be considered thermally safe for the pulp chamber.

Highlights

  • In the last few decades, composite materials have been widely used for conservative dentistry, resin-based composites are subjected to volumetric contraction during polymerization, Materials 2020, 13, 5664; doi:10.3390/ma13245664 www.mdpi.com/journal/materialsMaterials 2020, 13, 5664 providing satisfactory aesthetics

  • Shrinkage of Smart Dentin Replacement (SDR) was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of SonicFill, while the strength and the Young’s modulus of Sonic Fill were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those of SDR. For both SDR and SonicFill composites, no significant difference (p = 0.95 and p = 0.12, respectively) was observed for cuspal distance variation according to MOD cavities restored through the bulk-fill or the incremental layering techniques

  • A lower cuspal distance variation would be expected for Sonic Fill, as shrinkage values of SonicFill were lower than SDR, no significant difference in cuspal deflection between SonicFill and SDR was observed according to both the bulk fill and the incremental layering techniques

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the last few decades, composite materials have been widely used for conservative dentistry, resin-based composites are subjected to volumetric contraction during polymerization, Materials 2020, 13, 5664; doi:10.3390/ma13245664 www.mdpi.com/journal/materialsMaterials 2020, 13, 5664 providing satisfactory aesthetics. The aim of this study was to investigate cuspal deflection caused by material shrinkage and temperature rise occurring in the pulp chamber during photopolymerization. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of flowable and packable bulk-fill composites on cuspal deflection occurring in mesio-occlusal–distal (MOD) cavities restored through the bulk-fill or through the incremental layering technique. Methods: Two bulk-fill composites (high-viscosity and low-viscosity), largely differing in material composition, were used These composites were characterized through linear shrinkage and compressive test. Conclusions: No significant difference in cusp deflection between the two composites was observed according to both the restorative techniques This result can be ascribed to the Young’s modulus suggesting that the packable composite is stiffer, while the flowable composite is more compliant, balancing the cusp distance variation. The light curing modality of 1000 mW/cm for 20 s can be considered thermally safe for the pulp chamber

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call