Abstract
are neither true nor false. At the same time, however, Katz claims that they are meaningful, all the same. Thus, Katz attempts to do what some might take to be the impossible: maintain consistency while rejecting the view that liar sentences are meaningless. Following Katz, we characterize his response to the liar paradox as a response to (what he calls) the Epimenidean Dilemma (herein, the ED), where
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
