Abstract

Opinion statementDespite numerous case reports, the evidence for treatment of bruxism is still low. Different treatment modalities (behavioral techniques, intraoral devices, medications, and contingent electrical stimulation) have been applied. A clinical evaluation is needed to differentiate between awake bruxism and sleep bruxism and rule out any medical disorder or medication that could be behind its appearance (secondary bruxism). A polysomnography is required only in a few cases of sleep bruxism, mostly when sleep comorbidities are present. Counselling with regard to sleep hygiene, sleep habit modification, and relaxation techniques has been suggested as the first step in the therapeutic intervention, and is generally considered not harmful, despite low evidence of any efficacy. Occlusal splints are successful in the prevention of dental damage and grinding sounds associated with sleep bruxism, but their effects on reducing bruxism electromyographic (EMG) events are transient. In patients with psychiatric and sleep comorbidities, the acute use of clonazepam at night has been reported to improve sleep bruxism, but in the absence of double-blind randomized trials, its use in general clinical practice cannot be recommended. Severe secondary bruxism interfering with speaking, chewing, or swallowing has been reported in patients with neurological disorders such as in cranial dystonia; in these patients, injections of botulinum toxin in the masticatory muscles may decrease bruxism for up to 1–5 months and improve pain and mandibular functions. Long-term studies in larger and better specified samples of patients with bruxism, comparing the effects of different therapeutic modalities on bruxism EMG activity, progression of dental wear, and orofacial pain are current gaps of knowledge and preclude the development of severity-based treatment guidelines.

Highlights

  • Bruxism is an oral motor condition which has raised interest in dental, sleep, and neurological research in the last 10 years, with more than 1200 articles published in MEDLINE including 151 review papers

  • A clinical evaluation is needed to differentiate between awake bruxism and sleep bruxism and rule out any medical disorder or medication that could be behind its appearance

  • Occlusal splints are successful in the prevention of dental damage and grinding sounds associated with sleep bruxism, but their effects on reducing bruxism electromyographic (EMG) events are transient

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Bruxism is an oral motor condition which has raised interest in dental, sleep, and neurological research in the last 10 years, with more than 1200 articles published in MEDLINE including 151 review papers. Awake bruxism is usually seen as a jaw clenching habit that appears in response to stress and anxiety states [2], while sleep bruxism represents a sleep related rhythmic masticatory activity generally associated with arousals (from sleep) [3, 4] Both awake and sleep bruxism are sub classified into either primary, not related to any other medical condition, or secondary, associated to neurological disorders or considered an adverse effect of drugs [5,6,7,8]. Based on face-to-face questionnaires and telephone interviews, the prevalence of sleep bruxism (i.e., teeth grinding episodes during sleep) has been estimated around 8 % of the adult population and gradually decreases with aging [9, 10]. There is no available data in relation to prevalence of secondary bruxism, and most of the literature derives from cases reports

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call