Current state of the institute of administrative liability in the field of urban planning

Abstract

Introdaction. The article uncovers the state of the institute of administrative liability in the field of urban planning considering current situation. The attention is focused on the main directions of transformation of development of administrative liability, the problems are described and the ways of their solution are proposed.
 In connection with the implementation of various reforms, the existing urban construction relationships has radically changed and the new ones has emerged in the society, which are characterized by a tendency of growth. Therefore, considering new conditions and requirements, these relations require the introduction of new effective administrative and legal regulation. One of the important tools of this regulation is administrative liability in the field of urban planning, which helps to ensure compliance with the norms provided by law, state standards, construction codes, and rules.
 The perspective directions of the evolution of the institute of administrative liability are the improvement of the system of administrative penalties by expanding their number and size and improving the system of subjects of responsibility.
 Purpose and tasks. The purpose of the work is to determine the current state of scientific understanding of administrative liability in the field of urban planning on the basis of the analysis of theoretical foundations, regulatory system and practice, as well as to focus on the actual issues of its application in practice.
 Results. It is proven that the institute of administrative liability in the field of urban planning undergoes transformation, but the scientific understanding of this process is not at the proper level.
 Conclusions. In general, the institution of administrative liability in the field of urban planning requires substantial modernization, but not at the expense of making changes and additions to the current legislation, but on the basis of the creation of a new doctrine of understanding of administrative liability combined with the application of a systematic approach.  All of the above will provide an opportunity for the creation of effective mechanisms for applying the institute of administrative liability in practice.