Abstract
Recent comparative studies of quasiparticle injection from colossal magnetoresistance (CMR) materials and normal metals into high transition temperature superconductors (HTS) have led several investigators to conclude that spin-polarized injection from CMR electrodes is far more efficient than ordinary injection in suppressing superconductivity. On the other hand, some ordinary quasiparticle injection experiments have shown greater suppression of superconductivity than was claimed in any of the published spin-injection experiments. Careful analysis and numerical simulations lead us to argue that all spin-injection experiments to date have been hampered by inadequate control samples and that the reported results can be explained by ordinary (unpolarized) quasiparticle injection or simple current summation. We conclude that there is no conclusive evidence that spin-polarized injection into HTS behaves differently from ordinary quasiparticle injection and we discuss criteria for future experiments that could differentiate between the two types of injection.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
