Abstract
This study examines the fatigue damage accumulation process associated with a commonly produced forged vanadium-based microalloyed (MA) steel and its comparison with its quenched and tempered (Q&T) counterpart at the same hardness level. The advantage of MA steels compared to the traditional Q&T steels is the elimination of the costly quenching and tempering processes. Completely reversed strain-controlled two-level block loading tests were conducted on smooth axial specimens at room temperature. Under multi-level block cycling, the two steels displayed different characteristics, though they showed similar behaviour in constant amplitude fatigue. Therefore, a key to successful assessment of fatigue damage accumulation under variable amplitude service loading is selection of an appropriate cumulative fatigue life prediction model which reflects the material's damage characteristics. The effectiveness of several cumulative fatigue damage models and their life prediction capabilities are evaluated using the experimental data.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
