Abstract
In this essay I look at The Birth of Tragedy in order to explore two related issues. First, beginning with Nietzsche’s own later critical look back at the book, I argue that in lamenting both the influence of Schopenhauer, and the inclusion of an extended discussion of contemporary German culture, Nietzsche underplayed the interdependence of these elements and his analysis of tragedy and its significance in the book. Second, I argue that to understand Nietzsche's Schopenhauerian concept of tragedy we may begin from the perspective of the term's common usage, attending to phenomena often labelled tragic, and glimpsing what holds sway just beneath their surfaces. Ultimately, although Nietzsche's expressed understanding of tragedy in these early years drew heavily on Schopenhauerian pessimism, it nevertheless exceeded that influence.
Highlights
In this essay I look at The Birth of Tragedy (1872), Nietzsche's first published book, in order to explore two related issues
- 48 PhaenEx philosophical underpinnings, and making a brief excursus into Nietzsche's reading of Anaximander in order to help clarify what is at stake
A very few noble souls were capable of properly understanding the seriousness of ancient Greek tragedy and the titanic powers it unbound, it seemed, and such a state of affairs was symptomatic of a contemporary cultural crisis
Summary
In this essay I look at The Birth of Tragedy (1872), Nietzsche's first published book, in order to explore two related issues.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.