Abstract
The author answers Nicholas Garnham by rejecting the latter’s definition and genealogy of cultural studies and the political economy of communication. Grossberg notes that the populist and celebratory current with which Garnham identifies cultural studies actually represents a minority, and is challenged within that very research field. While reasserting that political economy has not always managed to move away from reductionism, he defends the validity of the epistemological and empirical boundaries between political economy and cultural studies. Finally, he advocates not their reconciliation, but a broad use of the concept of articulation to grasp the links between politics, economics and culture.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
