Abstract

In a previous paper, the authors have expected from electrical resistivity changes of the deformed or quenched Cu-Ge alloys that anneal-hardening might not occur in Cu-Ge solid solutions.In this paper, (i) it was ascertained that the anneal-hardening did not occur in the Cu-Ge alloys, but it occurred in Cu-Al alloys. (ii) In order to make clear the origin of anneal-hardening, the flow-stress and the resistivity change by plastic deformation at room temperature are measured for Cu-Ge, Cu-Al and Cu-Ni alloys, and the X-ray (111) and (200) peak shifts by low temperature annealing were investigated in addition to Vickers hardeness measurment. (iii) The cause of anneal-hardening introducing wipe-out number was discussed. The results obtained are as follows:(1) The anneal-hardening does not occur in Cu-Ge and Cu-20.77 at%Ni solid solutions, but it is observed in a Cu-10.37 at%Al alloy.(2) The specific resistivity change Δρ⁄ρ0 by cold work and the work hardening of Cu-Al alloys are larger than those of Cu-Ge alloys.(3) The isothermal annealing curve of the X-ray (111) and (200) peak shift difference of Cu-10.37 at%Al alloy has two steps corresponding to the isothermal anneal hardening.(4) The smaller the wipe-out number of solute atom, the easier solute atoms may form a kind of fine ordered lattice structure. The anneal-hardening may be attributed to the formation of the ordered lattice structure rather than the segregation of solute atoms at the stacking faults.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call