Abstract

Objective To evaluate the postoperative related aesthetic parameters and satisfactory degree between CT 3D reconstruction augmentation rhinoplasty with silicone and augmentation rhinoplasty with silicone in adult Han women. Methods Totally 60 adult healthy Han women voluntarily subjected to augmentation rhinoplasty with silicone were randomly divided into groups A and B, 30 people each group; Row CT 3D reconstruction augmentation rhinoplasty with silicone was performed in group A, and the augmentation rhinoplasty with silicone in group B; 6 months after surgery related data measurement and questionnaire collected, we compared the objective and subjective indicators for the nasal root, dorsum and ministry, respectively. Results There was a difference between group A and group B in the nasorostral angle, the nasal facial angle, the asofrontal angle and the height of the nasal root (89.50±1.40)°, (28.85±2.20)°, (136.26±1.92)°, (6.45±0.27) mm in group A, and (85.40±3.70)°, (26.43±4.39)°, (138.88±4.78)°, (5.28±0.34) mm in group B (all P<0.05). There was a difference between group A and group B in operation time (51.77±5.35) min vs (29.83±5.76) min (P<0.05). Conclusions Owing to its preoperative prosthesis design purpose and avoiding local swelling, CT 3D reconstruction augmentation rhinoplasty with silicone has better effects than that of augmentation rhinoplasty with silicone, especially on the nasal dorsum and the nasal root), which can obviously shorten the operation time, and therefore it is more suitable for the defects of the nasal root and dorsum. Key words: Three-dimensional reconstruction; Rhinoplasty; Han nationality

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call