Abstract

Abstract Background Coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a common cause of heart transplant failure. Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) is used to assess for luminal stenoses in patients with suspected CAV, but additional non-invasive markers are needed to detect early disease and guide the use of treatments that can prevent or slow CAV progression. Purpose We tested the hypotheses that: 1) coronary artery inflammation assessed by pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) density and/or total vessel volume-to-myocardial mass ratio (V/M) measured by CCTA could improve the ability to detect CAV in heart transplant patients; and 2) these semi-automated quantitative CCTA metrics would be associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Methods In this retrospective observational cohort study, PCAT density, V/M, and lesion composition were measured in consecutive CCTAs from patients who underwent heart transplantation at a single site between 2010 to 2021. These parameters were incorporated into predictive models for CAV as defined by International Society for Heart & Lung Transplant criteria, and evaluated against long-term clinical outcomes. Results A total of 126 CCTAs were analysed from 94 patients after heart transplant (mean age 49 [SD 14.5] years, 40% female) without CAV (n=86) and with CAV (n=40). PCAT density was higher in transplant patients with CAV (-73.0 HU [SD 9.26]) than without CAV (-77.9 HU [SD 8.23]), and age and sex-matched controls (n=12; -86.19 HU, [SD 5.38]), p<0.001 for both. Unlike patients with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (n=32), CAV lesions were predominately non-calcified, comprised of mostly fibrous or fibrofatty tissue. V/M was lower in patients with CAV than without (32.4 mm3/g vs. 44.4 mm3/g, p<0.001). PCAT density and V/M improved the ability to predict CAV from AUC 0.78 to 0.87 on receiver operating characteristic analysis (Figure A) when added to donor age and donor/recipient hypertension status (p<0.0001). PCAT density above -66 HU was associated with a greater incidence of all-cause mortality (OR 16.6 95%CI 2.88-109.98, p<0.01; Figure B, box-plot) and the composite endpoint of death, CAV progression, acute rejection, and coronary revascularisation (OR 6.3 95%CI 1.6-32.9, p=0.01) over 5.25 (SD 2.1) years. Conclusions Heart transplant patients with CAV have higher PCAT density and lower V/M than those without. Patients with very high PCAT density on CT had markedly increased incidence of all-cause mortality and major adverse clinical events. These semi-automated metrics could be a useful addition to standard clinical CCTA reporting for diagnosis and monitoring of CAV.Diagnostic Benefit of CTCA MetricsPCAT is predictor of Future Mortality

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call