Crystallization in ABC Triblock Copolymers with Two Different Crystalline End Blocks: Influence of Confinement on Self‐Nucleation Behavior

Abstract

AbstractThe influence of different confinements active during crystallization within polybutadiene‐block‐polyisoprene‐block‐poly(ethylene oxide) (PB‐b‐PI‐b‐PEO) and the corresponding hydrogenated polyethylene‐block‐poly(ethylene‐alt‐propylene)‐block‐poly(ethylene oxide) (PE‐b‐PEP‐b‐PEO) triblock copolymers on the self‐nucleation behavior of the crystallizable PEO and PE blocks is investigated by means of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). In triblock copolymers with PEO contents ≤ 20 wt.‐% crystallization of PEO is confined within small isolated microdomains (spheres or cylinders), and PEO crystallization takes place exclusively at high supercoolings. Self‐nucleation experiments reveal an anomalous behavior in comparison to the classical self‐nucleation behavior found in semicrystalline homopolymers. In these systems, domain II (exclusive self‐nucleation domain) vanishes, and self‐nucleation can only take place at lower temperatures in domain IIISA, when annealing is already active. The self‐nucleation behavior of the PE blocks is significantly different compared with that of the PEO blocks. Regardless of the low PE content (10–25 wt.‐%) in the investigated PE‐b‐PEP‐b‐PEO triblock copolymers a classical self‐nucleation behavior is observed, i.e., all three self‐nucleation domains, usually present in crystallizable homopolymers, can be located. This is a direct result of the small segmental interaction parameter of the PEP and PE segments in the melt. As a consequence, crystallization of PE occurs without confinement from a homogeneous mixture of PE and PEP segments. Self‐nucleation regimes of a block copolymer showing confined crystallization by means of DSC.magnified imageSelf‐nucleation regimes of a block copolymer showing confined crystallization by means of DSC.