Abstract
In cancer research, clustering techniques are widely used for exploratory analyses, playing a critical role in the identification of novel cancer subtypes and patient management. As data collected by multiple research groups grows, it is increasingly feasible to investigate the replicability of clustering procedures, that is, their ability to consistently recover biologically meaningful clusters across several data sets. In this paper, we review methods for replicability of clustering analyses, and discuss a novel framework for evaluating cross-study clustering replicability, useful when two or more studies are available. Our approach can be applied to any clustering algorithm and can employ different measures of similarity between partitions to quantify replicability, globally (i.e., for the whole sample) as well as locally (i.e., for individual clusters). Using experiments on synthetic and real gene expression data, we illustrate the usefulness of our procedure to evaluate if the same clusters are identified consistently across a collection of data sets.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.