Abstract

BackgroundSingle nucleotide substitutions in protein-coding genes can be divided into synonymous (S), with little fitness effect, and non-synonymous (N) ones that alter amino acids and thus generally have a greater effect. Most of the N substitutions are affected by purifying selection that eliminates them from evolving populations. However, additional mutations of nearby bases potentially could alleviate the deleterious effect of single substitutions, making them subject to positive selection. To elucidate the effects of selection on double substitutions in all codons, it is critical to differentiate selection from mutational biases.ResultsWe addressed the evolutionary regimes of within-codon double substitutions in 37 groups of closely related prokaryotic genomes from diverse phyla by comparing the fractions of double substitutions within codons to those of the equivalent double S substitutions in adjacent codons. Under the assumption that substitutions occur one at a time, all within-codon double substitutions can be represented as “ancestral-intermediate-final” sequences (where “intermediate” refers to the first single substitution and “final” refers to the second substitution) and can be partitioned into four classes: (1) SS, S intermediate–S final; (2) SN, S intermediate–N final; (3) NS, N intermediate–S final; and (4) NN, N intermediate–N final. We found that the selective pressure on the second substitution markedly differs among these classes of double substitutions. Analogous to single S (synonymous) substitutions, SS double substitutions evolve neutrally, whereas analogous to single N (non-synonymous) substitutions, SN double substitutions are subject to purifying selection. In contrast, NS show positive selection on the second step because the original amino acid is recovered. The NN double substitutions are heterogeneous and can be subject to either purifying or positive selection, or evolve neutrally, depending on the amino acid similarity between the final or intermediate and the ancestral states.ConclusionsThe results of the present, comprehensive analysis of the evolutionary landscape of within-codon double substitutions reaffirm the largely conservative regime of protein evolution. However, the second step of a double substitution can be subject to positive selection when the first step is deleterious. Such positive selection can result in frequent crossing of valleys on the fitness landscape.

Highlights

  • Single nucleotide substitutions in protein-coding genes can be divided into synonymous (S), with little fitness effect, and non-synonymous (N) ones that alter amino acids and generally have a greater effect

  • It has been claimed that positive selection is overestimated by the branch-site test (BST) because many if not most of the sites supporting positive selection are multinucleotide substitutions that could result from multinucleotide mutations [14]

  • In the case of serine, the proposed scenario is that a non-synonymous (N) substitution that leads to the replacement of a serine with another amino acid and is deleterious is followed by a second substitution that restores serine and, the protein function and the original fitness value [17]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Single nucleotide substitutions in protein-coding genes can be divided into synonymous (S), with little fitness effect, and non-synonymous (N) ones that alter amino acids and generally have a greater effect. Independent of BST, double substitutions within the same codon in proteincoding genes have been repeatedly claimed to be driven by positive selection. This conclusion follows from the comparison of the observed frequencies of double substitutions to those expected from the frequencies of single substitutions. If the frequency of a double substitution is Belinky et al BMC Biology (2019) 17:105 significantly greater than the product of the frequencies of the respective single substitutions, positive selection is inferred [15,16,17] Such apparent signs of positive selection affecting double substitutions have been detected as a general trend in the mouse-rat lineage [15]. The fixation of the second mutation has been attributed to positive selection, and the observed excessive frequency of double substitutions has been explained by this effect of selection, as opposed to a mutational bias

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call