Abstract

Hundreds of new features and functionalities have been introduced as in-vehicle systems (IVS) mature. However, it remains unclear whether these novel designs have appropriately addressed driver preferences and requirements, especially when factors such as geographical or cultural differences are considered. An empirical study was conducted to determine cultural differences between young Chinese and German drivers with respect to (a) preferences for 18 selected IVS and (b) behavioral effects in six secondary driving tasks. Data from 232 Chinese and 94 German drivers were collected through an online questionnaire and the results indicate that young Chinese drivers value most of the selected IVS designs more significantly than the Germans do, except in categories such as radio, navigation and autonomous emergency braking. In addition, rotary with a display screen is the most preferred interaction modality for both groups. As for behavioral effects when performing secondary tasks, young Chinese drivers are more likely to engage in safety-related scenarios while the Germans in efficiency-related scenarios. An ordinal logistic regression analysis suggested a strong correlation between secondary tasks (looking up navigation, dialing the phone and connecting Bluetooth) and behavioral degradation for young Chinese drivers, whereas the six secondary tasks seem to affect German drivers minimally. Based on the preference analysis and attitudes to behavioral impacts, implications for the design of IVS are discussed to better satisfy needs from drivers of different cultural backgrounds.

Highlights

  • Driving is a sophisticated and safety-critical process with multiple tasks

  • A series of t-tests were performed to determine whether significant differences existed between young Chinese and German drivers regarding the importance ratings of 10 In-Vehicle Information System (IVIS) functions and eight Advanced Driver Assistance System (ADAS) functions

  • Young Chinese drivers perceived most of the selected In-vehicle System (IVS) functions to be significantly more important than German drivers did and the only exceptions were radio, navigation and AEB

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The primary tasks require drivers to take good control of the vehicle by accelerating, braking, steering and detecting hazards [1]. Secondary tasks aim to enhance the driving experience by offering an entertaining and comfortable environment instead of ensuring driver safety. Secondary tasks require drivers’ attention away from road traffic to perform certain activities, impairing the drivers’ ability of hazard detection and vehicle control. Naturalistic data has indicated that ‘just driving’ without conducting any secondary tasks only accounts for 46% of the overall driving time [4]. Farmer [5] observed a random sample of 108 drivers for one year and found that these drivers spent 42% of their driving time conducting at least one secondary task. Secondary tasks present much more distraction and hazards besides the entertaining driving experiences. It has been reported that driver distraction out of secondary tasks is related to over 22% crashes/near-crashes [6,7]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call