CROP ROTATIONS WITH FULL AND LIMITED IRRIGATION AND DRYLAND MANAGEMENT

Abstract

ABSTRACT Irrigated cropping systems need to maximize the economic value of both rainfall and irrigation water, especially in areas of declining groundwater. This study compared water management systems in a winter wheat (Triticum aestivum, L.)-corn {Zea mays, L.)-soybean (Glycine max, L.) (W-C-S) and continuous corn (CC) rotation in west central Nebraska for dryland, limited irrigation (150 mm/yr), and full irrigation. Crop yield, evapotranspiration, and soil water storage were determined from field studies conducted at North Platte, Nebraska, on a Cozad silt loam (Fluventic HaplustoU) soil. Dryland com used 21.5% more evapotranspiration (ET) in the W-C-S rotation compare to CC. ET for the limited and full irrigation com was 4.6% and 4.9% more for the W-C-S rotation compared to the CC and was statistically significant at the P > 0.08 level. Water use efficiency, defined by the slope of the linear relationship between grain yield and ET (3Y 3ET-^), was the same for com in the W-C-S and CC rotations. Com grain yield response to irrigation and ET was more than the yield response of winter wheat and soybean. The W-C-S rotation increased com grain yields in two out of three years at this location for dryland management and increased the seasonal ET of corn compared to continuous corn. Full irrigation management did not consistently increase winter wheat and soybean grain yields above the limited irrigation treatments. Soil water storage for the full irrigation management was greatly reduced compared to dryland and limited irrigation management for both rotations.