Abstract
In this article, I reflect on my recent experience to call for progress to address pervasive disability discrimination, including more attention in disability studies to empower disabled people to pursue their preferences in public life. Relating to Nolan’s recent story, I highlight a six-fold barrier for disabled people to challenge discrimination, in particular critiquing the ambiguity of ‘reasonableness’ in reasonable adjustment which dilutes legal obligation and reduces its efficacy in practice. Reasonable adjustment has been construed with an ableist mind frame and places an unfair and unrealistic burden on disabled people to access justice. I argue for equality of preference between disabled and non-disabled people to normalise disability, urging everyone to take positive action against disability discrimination.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.